[1] Azeroual, O., Saake, G., Abuosba, M. (2018). Data quality measures and data cleansing for research information systems, Journal of digital information management, 16 (1), p 12-21.
[2] Azeroual, O. (2019). Text and data quality mining in CRIS, Information, Vol. 10, p 374.

[3] Azeroual, O., Saake, G., Abuosba, M., Schöpfel, J. (2020). Data Quality as a Critical Success Factor for User Acceptance of Research Information Systems. Data, 5 (2), p 35.
[4] Bornmann, L., Williams, R. (2017). Can the journal impact factor be used as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers? A large-scale empirical study based on ResearcherID data. Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 11, p 788–799. 
[5] Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Hug, S., Daniel, H. D. (2011). A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants,
Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 5, p 346–359.

[6] Boudin, F., Gallina, Y., Aizawa, A. (2020, July). Keyphrase Generation for Scientific Document Retrieval In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
[7] Bras-Amorós, M., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Torra, V. (2011). A bibliometric index based on the collaboration distance between cited and citing authors, Journal of Informetrics,
Vol. 5, p 248–264.
[8] Brody, T. (2003). Citebase Search: Autonomous Citation Database, In Third international technical workshop and conference of the project SIN, Oldenburg, Germany.
[9] Carterette, B., Voorhees, E. (2011). Overview of Information Retrieval Evaluation, Current Challenges in Patent Information Retrieval, Vol. 29, p 69–85. 

[10] De Ribaupierre, H., Falquet, G. (2013). A user-centric model to semantically annotate and retrieve scientific documents, In: Proceedings of the sixth international workshop
on Exploiting semantic annotations in information retrieval, p 21–24. ACM.
[11] De Silva, P. U., Vance, C. K. (2017). Measuring the impact of scientific research, In Scientific Scholarly Communication, p 101–115. Springer, Cham.
[12] Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index, Scientometrics, Vol. 69, p 121–129. 

[13] Fisas, B., Ronzano, F., Saggion, H. (2016). A multilayered annotated corpus of scientific papers, In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language
Resources and Evaluation LREC2016, Paris, France. 
[14] Gábor, K., Zargayouna, H., Buscaldi, D., Tellier , I. and Charnois, T. (2016). Semantic Annotation of the ACL Anthology Corpus for the Automatic Analysis of Scientific
Literature, In: Proceedings of the LREC Conference, Portoroz, Slovenia.
[15] Galke, L., Mai, F., Schelten, A., Brunsch, D., Scherp, A. (2017). Using Titles vs. Full-text as Source for Automated Semantic Document Annotation, In: Proceedings
of the Knowledge Capture Conference, Austin, USA, p20–28. ACM.
[16] Halevi, G., Moed, H., Bar-Ilan, J. (2017). Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation-Review of
the literature, Journal of Informetrics, Volume 11, p 823–834.
[17] Hammarfelt, B., Rushforth, A. D. (2017). Indicators as judgment devices: An empirical study of citizen bibliometrics in research evaluation, Research Evaluation,
Volume 26, p 169–180.
[18] Harzing, A. W. (2011). The publish or perish book: your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis. Tarma software research, Australia.
[19] Harzing, A. W., Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and crossdisciplinary comparison, Scientometrics, Volume
106, p 787–804.
[20] Haustein, S. (2016). Grand challenges in altmetrics: heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies, Scientometrics, Volume 108, p 413–423.
[21] Herrera, N. P., Gomez, F. L., Bucheli, V. A., Pabón, O. S. (2017). Semantic annotation and retrieval of scientific documents in a big data environment, In the 7th
Latin American Conference on Networked and Electronic Media (LACNEM2017). Valparaiso, Chile. 
[22] Hirsch, J. (2005). An index to quantify an individual?s scientific research output, In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Volume 102, p 16569–16572.
[23] Hood, W. W., Wilson, C. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics, Scientometrics, 52, p 291–314.
[24] Huggins-Hoyt, K. Y. (2018). African American Faculty in Social Work Schools: A Citation Analysis of Scholarship, Research on Social Work Practice, Volume 28,
p 300-308.
[25] Ibrahim, N., Habacha Chaibi, A., Ben Ghézela, H. (2017). Scientometric re-ranking approach to improve search results, In the 21st International Conference on
Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information Engineering Systems, Marseille, France, p 447–456. IEEE. 

[26] Ibrahim, N., Habacha Chaibi, A., Ben Ahmed, M. (2015). New scientometric indicator for the qualitative evaluation of scientific production, New Library World
Journal, Volume 116, p 661–676.
[27] Kboubi, F., Habacha, A C., Ben Ahmed, M. (2012). Semantic Visualization and Navigation in Textual Corpus, International Journal of Information Sciences and Techniques
(IJIST). Vol. 2, p 53–63. 
[28] Manis, J. G. (1951). Some academic influences upon publication productivity Social Forces, Vol. 29, p 267– 272.
[29] Mayr, P., Scharnhorst, A. (2015). Scientometrics and information retrieval: weak-links revitalized, Scientometrics, Vol. 102, p 2193–2199. 

[30] Milojevic, S., Radicchi, F., Bar-Ilan, J. (2017). Citation  success index- An intuitive pair-wise journal comparison metric, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 11, p 223–
231. 
[31] Moed, H. F. (2017). From Journal Impact Factor to SJR, Eigenfactor, SNIP, CiteScore and Usage Factor, in Applied Evaluative Informetrics, p 229–244. Springer,
Cham.
[32] Noyons, E. C., Moed, H. F., Van Raan, A. F. (1999). Integrating research performance analysis and science mapping, Scientometrics, Vol. 46, p 591–604.
[33] Pal, S., Moore, T. J., Ramanathan, R., Swami, A. (2017). Comparative Topological Signatures of Growing Collaboration Networks, in Workshop on Complex Networks
CompleNet , p 201–209. Springer, Cham.

[34] Robertson, S. E. (1997). The probability ranking principle in IR, Journal of documentation, Volume 33, p 294– 304.
[35] Schöpfel, J., Azeroual, O., Saake, G. (2019). Implementation and user acceptance of research information systems: An empirical survey of German universities and
research organisations, Data Technologies and Applications, 54 (1), p 1-15. 
[36] Singhal, A., Kasturi, R., Srivastava, J. (2013). Automating document annotation using open source knowledge, In: Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International
Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT). p 199–204. IEEE Computer Society.
[37] Strohman, T., Metzler, D., Turtle, H., Croft, W.B. (2005). Indri: A language model-based search engine  for complex queries, In: Proceedings of the International
Conference on Intelligent Analysis, p 2–6.
[38] Thelwall, M. (2018). Microsoft Academic automatic document searches: accuracy for journal articles and suitability for citation analysis, Journal of Informetrics,
Volume 12, p 1–9.
[39] Van Raan, A. F. J. (2013). Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology. Elsevier.
[40] Walker, J. (2002). CrossRef and SFX: complementary linking services for libraries, New Library World, Vol. 3, p 83–89.
[41] Walters, W. H. (2017). Do subjective journal ratings represent whole journals or typical articles?, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 11, p 730–744.
[42] Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., Wouters, P. (2014). How well developed are altmetrics? A crossdisciplinary analysis of the presence of alternative metrics? In: Scientific
publications, Scientometrics, Volume 101, p 1491–1513.
[43] Zhang, C. T. (2009). The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations, PLoS One, Volume 4, p 29–54.
[44] Zhao, H., Luo, Z., Feng, C., Ye, Y. (2019, July). A context-based framework for resource citation classification in scientific literatures, In: Proceedings of the 42nd
International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, p 1041-1044.