| References: [1] Ortega., José Luis., Isidro F. Aguillo. (2014). Microsoft academic search and Google scholar citations: Comparative analysis of author profiles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65.6 (2014): 1149-1156.
[2] Karen A. Hartman., Laura Bowering Mullen. (2008). Google Scholar and academic libraries: an update, New Library World, Vol. 109 Iss: 5/6, p 211 - 222.
[3] Peter Jacso. (2005). Google Scholar: the pros and the cons, Online Information Review, 29 (2), p 208 – 214.
[4] Pomerantz, J. (2006). Google Scholar and 100 percent availability of information, Information Technology and Libraries, Vol. 25 No. 1, p 52-56.
[5] Neuhaus, C., Neuhaus, E., Asher, A., Wrede, C. (2006). The depth and breadth of Google Scholar: An empirical study, Portal-Libraries and the Academy, Vol. 6 No. 2, p 127-141.
[6] Walters, W.H. (2007). Google Scholar coverage of a multidisciplinary field, Information Processing & Management, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 1121-1132.
[7] Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century: A review, Journal of Informetrics, 2 (1), p 1-52
[8] Mayr, P., Walter, A.-K. (2007). An exploratory study of Google Scholar, Online Information Review, 31 (6), p 814-830
[9] Lewandowski, D. (2007). Web Searching: A Quality Measurement Perspective. In Web Searching: Interdisciplinary Perspectives Dordrecht: Springer.
[10] Meier, J J., Conkling, T W. (2008). Google Scholars coverage of the Engineering Literature : An Empirical Study The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34 196-201. |
Author Rights 
