International Journal of Information Studies

DLINE Journals portal

Home

New Journals

Browse Journals

Journal Prices

For Authors

Print ISSN:1911 8408
Online ISSN:1911 8414

About IJIS
	DLINE Portal Home Home Aims & Scope Editorial Board Current Issue Next Issue Previous Issue Sample Issue Upcoming Conferences Self-archiving policy Alert Services Be a Reviewer Publisher Paper Submission Subscription Contact us

How To Order
	Order Online Price Information Request for Complimentary Print Copy

For Authors
	Guidelines for Contributors Online Submission Call for Papers Author Rights

RELATED JOURNALS

Journal of Digital Information Management (JDIM)

Journal of Multimedia Processing and Technologies (JMPT)

International Journal of Web Application (IJWA)

International Journal of Information Studies

Research Publications in the IEEE Transactions on Education: A Bibliometric Analysis

M. Suresh Babu., P Gopala Krishna
Gokaraju Rangaraju Institute of Engineering & Technology (Autonomous & NAAC A++) Hyderabad

Abstract: In the last decade, scientometric studies get momentum due to extensive research activities in the domain. Out of the various kinds of studies, the research on individual journals and their contributions is gaining interest among researchers. We, in this work, have analyzed the 1169 contributions published in the IEEE Transactions on Education for twenty years between 2001 and 2020. An attempt is made to explore and discuss the article, year-wise and volume-wise authorship, the annual growth rate of publications, relative growth rate, doubling time, authorÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s productivity, and the single and multi-authored papers of the journal. The findings of the results revealed that the maximum number of publications ((7.36%) were published in the year 2005, whereas the minimum number (2.91%) were published in the year 2014. The degree of collaboration (DC) ranges, the relative growth rates (RGR), and doubling time (DT) has also been measured. The average number of authors per paper is 2.72, and the average productivity per author is 0.37. The highest number of documents for authors at an average is 3.27, which was published in 2016.

Keywords: Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, IEEE Transactions on Education, Authorship Pattern; Degree of Collaboration, Relative Growth Rate, Publication Analysis Research Publications in the IEEE Transactions on Education: A Bibliometric Analysis

DOI:https://doi.org/10.6025/ijis/2022/14/3/79-90

Full_Text PDF 2.60 MB Download: 131 times

References:

[1] Blackman, V.H. (2005) Thecompoundinterestlawandplantgrowth. AnnalsofBotany, 33, 353–360.
[2] Ezhilrani, R., Surianarayanan, S. & Kanthimathi, S. (2006) Authorship patterna Collaborative researchinaquaculture Journals.SRELS JournalofInformationManagement, 43, 4, 391–398.
[3] Gupta, D.K. (1989) Lotka’sLawandItsapplicationtoAuthorProductivityDistribution of psychological LiteratureofAfrica,1966- 1975. HeraldofLibraryScience, 28, 11–21.
[4] Gupta, R., Ahmed, K.K.M., Gupta, B.M., Bansal, M. & Gupta, B.M. (2016) Lungcancer in India: A scientometric study of publications during 2005–14. International Journal of Medicine and Public Health, 6, 200–208 [DOI: 10.5530/ijmedph.2016.4.11].
[5] Plant, H.R. (1978). Growth Analysis. Edward Arnold: London.
[6] Kumar, R.S. & Kaliyaperumal, K.A. (2015) Scientometricanalysisofmobiletechnology publications. Scientometrics Int. J. Quant. Aspects Sci. Sci., Commun. Sci.Sci.Policy, 105, 921–939.
[7] Lotka, A.J. (1926) Statistics:Thefrequencydistributionofscientificproductivity. Journal of theWashington Academy of Sciences, 16, 317–325.
[8] Singh, K.P. & Bebi (2014) Libraryherald:Abibliometricstudy (2003–12). Library Herald, 52, 19–27.
[9] Subramanyan, K. (1983) Bibliometricstudiesofresearchcollaboration:areview. Information Sciences, 6, 33–38.
[10] Thavamani, K. (2014). Authorship Patterns and Collaborative Research in Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 1996-2012. Library Philosophy and Practice (E-journal), Vol. 117.
[11] Arkhipov, D.B. (1999) Scientometric analysis of Nature, the journal. Scientometrics, 46, 51–72 [DOI: 10.1007/BF02766295].
[12] Rice, R.E., Chapin, J., Pressman, R., Park, S. & Funkhouser, E. (1996) What’s in a name? Bibliometric analysis of 40 years of the journal of broadcasting (& electronic media). Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 40, 511–539 [DOI: 10.1080/ 08838159609364373].
[13] Harper, J.A. (1991) A bibliometric profile of the Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d’Agroeconomie, 39, 503–513 [DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.1991.tb03590.x].
[14] Seglen, P.O. (1992) The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43, 628–638 [DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199210)43:9<628::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-0].
[15] Plomp, R. (1990) The signifcance of the number of highly cited papers as an indicator of scientific prolifcacy. Scientometrics, 19, 185–197 [DOI: 10.1007/BF02095346].
[16] Aksnes, D.W. (2003) Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12, 159–170 [DOI: 10.3152/ 147154403781776645].
[17] Vinkler, P. (2007) Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators. Journal of Information Science, 33, 481–491 [DOI: 10.1177/0165551506072165].
[18] Vinkler, P. (2013) Quantity and impact through a single indicator. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 1084–1085 [DOI: 10.1002/asi.22833].
[19] Davey, M.G., Davey, M.S., Lowery, A.J. & Kerin, M.J. (2019) What proportion of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in the annals of surgery provide definitive conclusions—A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Publications, 10, 2022 [DOI: 10.3390/publications10020019].
[20] Juhl, C.B. & Lund, H. (2018) Do we really need another systematic review? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 52, 1408–1409 [DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099832] [PubMed: 30154206].
[21] Lund, H., Juhl, C. & Christensen, R. (2016) Systematic reviews and research waste. Lancet, 387, 123–124 [DOI: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(15)01354-9] [PubMed: 26841992].
[22] Kim, H.Y. (2017) Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test. Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 42, 152–155 [DOI: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.152] [PubMed: 28503482].
[23] Haidich, A.B. (2010) Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia, 14 (Supplement 1), 29–37 [PubMed: 21487488].

DLINE Journals portal