Home| Contact Us| New Journals| Browse Journals| Journal Prices| For Authors|

Print ISSN: 0976-416X
Online ISSN:
0976-4178


  About IJCLR
  DLINE Portal Home
Home
Aims & Scope
Editorial Board
Current Issue
Next Issue
Previous Issue
Sample Issue
Upcoming Conferences
Self-archiving policy
Alert Services
Be a Reviewer
Publisher
Paper Submission
Subscription
Contact us
 
  How To Order
  Order Online
Price Information
Request for Complimentary
Print Copy
 
  For Authors
  Guidelines for Contributors
Online Submission
Call for Papers
Author Rights
 
 
RELATED JOURNALS
Journal of Digital Information Management (JDIM)
Journal of Multimedia Processing and Technologies (JMPT)
International Journal of Web Application (IJWA)

 

 
International Journal of Computational Linguistics Research
 

 

Creating Taxonomy for Knowledge Representation of Sustainable Food Systems
Aneta Trajanov, Tanja Dergan, Marko Debeljak
Jozef Stefan Institute and Jozef Stefan International Postgraduate School Jamova cesta 39 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Abstract: Sustainability is becoming a core concept in every area (scientific, social, environmental and economic) of human life. Sustainability acknowledges that human civilization takes resources to sustain our modern way of life and strives towards balancing between our competing needs – our need to continue developing technologically and economically, and the need to protect the environment in which we live. However, sustainability is a very complex concept that incorporates social, environmental and economic aspects and interactions between them and can be described by a number of different sustainability indicators. Therefore, assessing the sustainability of a system is a demanding task and requires gathering and structuring of knowledge from experts, literature surveys and other sources. In this paper, we present the use of taxonomies to represent the complex concept of sustainability of European food systems. Structuring the knowledge on sustainable food systems in Europe is a first step in assessing their level of sustainability. The goal of this study is to use the developed taxonomies as basis for the development of a complex DSS system for assessment of the sustainability of legume food systems across the whole quality chain.
Keywords: Language Evolution, Cognitive Evolution, Palaeolithic, Stone Tools, Oldowan, Acheulean, Levallois, Cultural Transmission Creating Taxonomy for Knowledge Representation of Sustainable Food Systems
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6025/jcl/2019/10/1/19-26
Full_Text   PDF 262 KB   Download:   432  times
References:[1] Dale, V.H., Efroymson, R.A., Kline, K.L., Langholtz, M.H., Leiby, P.N., Oladosu, G.A., Davis, M.R., Downing, M.E., Hilliard, M.R. (2013). Indicators for Assessing Socioeconomic Sustainability of Bioenergy Systems: A Short List of Practical Measures. Ecological Indicators, 26: 87–102. [2] FAO, (1984). Potential population supporting capacities of lands in the developing world. FAO, (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), Rome. [3] Hayati, D., Ranjbar, Z., Karami, E. 2010. Measuring Agricultural Sustainability. In: Biodiversity, Biofuels, Agroforestry and Conservation Agriculture, Eds. Eric Lichtfouse, 5:73–100. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. [4] HLPE, 2014. Food losses and waste in the context of sustainable food systems. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome 2014. [5] Kwami, H. I, Che-Ani, A. I., Tawil, N. M., Tahir, M. M., Basri, H. (2014). Approach to Campus Sustainability at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM): A Review. Eds M.A. Othuman Mydin and A.I. Che Ani. E3S Web of Conferences 3. 01011. [6] Lambe, P. (2007). Organising knowledge: Taxonomies, Knowledge and Organisational Effectiveness. Chandos Publishing, Oxford, England. [7] Moldan, B., Janouskova, S., Hak, T., (2012). How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators, 17. 4–13. [8] Muñoz, Lucio. (2016). Linking Sustainable Development Indicators by Means of Present/Absent Sustainability Theory and Indices: The Case of Agenda 21, GDS, IIG, Spain. [9] Pollesch, N., Dale, V.H. (2015). Applications of Aggregation Theory to Sustainability Assessment. Ecological Economics, 114. 117–27. [10] Samuel, V.B., Agamuthu, P., Hashim, M.A. (2013). Indicators for Assessment of Sustainable Production: A Case Study of the Petrochemical Industry in Malaysia. Ecological Indicators, 24. 392–402. [11] Slocum, S.L. (2015). The Viable, Equitable and Bearable in Tanzania. Tourism Management Perspectives, 16. 92–99. [12] TRUE (TRansition paths towards sUstainable legume based systems in Europe), (2018). H2020 project, https://www.trueproject. eu (11 September 2018). [13] Van Cauwenbergh, N., Biala, K., Bielders, C., Brouckaert, V., Franchois, L., Cidad, V.G., Hermy, M., Mathijs, E., Muys, B., Reijnders, J., Sauvenier, X., Valckx, J., Vanclooster, M., der Veken, B.V., Wauters, E., Peeters, A. (2007). SAFE – a hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 120. 229–2

Home | Aim & Scope | Editorial Board | Author Guidelines | Publisher | Subscription | Previous Issue | Contact Us |Upcoming Conferences|Sample Issues|Library Recommendation Form|

 

Copyright © 2011 dline.info