A Guide to e-learning: Content Visualization Rubrics of E-learning Video
Anisa Putri Ambar Serayu, Mifthahul Fathia, Devi Pratami, Muhammad Azani School of Industrial and System Engineering, Telkom University Jl, Telekomunikasi 1 & Bandung 40257, Indonesia
Abstract: The rapid change in technology and internet has made a huge impact in education field. It has developed learning to the next point where anyone can learn anything from anyone else at any time. E-learning systems have become an
important part of delivering the modern university curriculum. There are many shapes or forms of e-learning; one common
form that everyone has known is a video-learning. Video is an effective medium to deliver knowledge or information to others
because video-learning is able to present the information or knowledge in a consistent and attractive kind of way. However,
not all video-learning succeed to deliver the information to students given the lack of knowledge educators have of which
kind of video that brings students’ interest more. This study focuses on how a video-learning can increase students’ performance
and what criteria of video should be applied in video-learning to acquire high students’ engagement and to increase students’ retention of the material. In this study, content visualization rubrics for e-learning video was created and tested. It’s proven to increase students’ performance by 61%.
Keywords: E-Learning, E-Learning Evaluation, Student’s Performance, Video-learning, Visualization A Guide to e-learning: Content Visualization Rubrics of E-learning Video
References:[1] Bonk, C. J. (2009). The World is Open: How Web Technology Is Revolutionizing Education. Honolulu, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
[2] Graff, M. (2003). Learning from web-based instructional systems and cognitive style. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34 (4) 407-418.
[3] Park, Y., Lim, K. (2015). Effect of Environmental and Human Constructs on E-Learning Effectiveness in Online University Settings. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8, p. 103-109.
[4] Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in The Digital Area. New York: McGraw-Hill
Companies.
[5] Clark, R. C., Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction. New Jersey: Wiley.
[6] Paechter, M., Maier, B., Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: their relation to learning
achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54 (1) 222-229.
[7] Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., Nunamaker, J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of
interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management, 43, p. 15-27.
[8] Hurtubise, L., Martin, B., Gilliland, A., Mahan, J. (2013). To Play or Not To Play: Leveraging Video in Medical Education.
Journal of Graduate Medical Education, p. 13-18.
[9] Pratami, D., Fajrillah, A. A. N., Kusumasari, T. F. (2018). Content Visualization: An Evaluation of PowerPoint Effectiveness as
a Learning Tool for Students. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7 (2) 840-844.
[10] Hyla, M. (2015). Why Videos And Movies In eLearning Are Bad Idea?. [Online] Available at: https://elearningindustry.com/
[Accessed 26 November 2018].
[11] Pandey, A. (2018). How Can You Use Interactive Videos Effectively In e-Learning. [Online] Available at: https://
elearningindustry.com/ [Accessed 26 November 2018].
[12] Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. Revised ed. New York: Taylor
& Francis.
[13] Oblinger, D. G., Hawkins, B. L. (2005). The myth about Elearning. s.l., Educause review.
[14] Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in. 6th ed. New York: Routledge.
[15] Guo, P. J., Kim, J., Rubin, R. (2014). How Video Production Affects Student Engagement: Atlanta, ACM.
[16] Jones, A. M. (2003). The use and abuse of PowerPoint in Teaching and Learning in the Life Sciences: A Personal Over-view,
Bioscience Education E-Journal 2 (November).
[17] Tse, C. A., Mohamad, M. (2013). A Study of Visual Design in PowerPoint Presentation Slide and its Relationship with PostGraduate Learner Engagement and Satisfaction. s.l., In: International Proceedings of Economics Development & Research, 78
(91).
[18] Choi, H. J., Johnson, S. D. (2005). The Effect of Context-Based Video Instruction on Learning and Motivation in Online
Course. American Journal of Distance Education, 19 (4) 215-227.
[19] McCrum-Gardner, E. (2008). Which is the correct statistical test to use?. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 46
(1) 38-41.
[20] Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., Gall, J. P. (2003). Educational research: An introduction. 6th ed. New York: Longman.
[21] Marsaglia, G., Tsang, W. W., Wang, J. (2003). Evaluating Kolmogorov’s Distribution. Journal of Statistical Software, 8 (18)
1-41.
[22] Abachi, H. M. (2018). Statistical Discretization of Continuous Attributes Using Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test. In: J. Wang, G.
Cong, J. Chen & J. Qi, eds. Databases Theory and Applications: 29th. Cham: Springer, p. 309–315.
[23] Kersey, A., Emberson, L. (2016). Tracing trajectories of audio-visual learning in the infant brain. Developmental Science, p.
1-13.
[24] Park, H. M. (2008). Univariate Analysis and Normality Test Using SAS, Stata, and SPSS, Indiana: The University Information
Technology Services (UITS) Center for Statistical and Mathematical Computing.
[25] Zhang, D., Zhao, J., Zhou, L., Nunamaker, J. (2004). Can e-learning replace traditional classroom learning—evidence and
implication of the evolving e-learning technology. Communications of the ACM, 47 (5) 75-79.
[26] Arkorful, N., Abaidoo. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education.,
International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12 (1) 29-42, 2015.
[27] Poria, S., Cambria, E., Howard, N., Huang, G.-B., Hussain, A. (2015). Fusing Audio, Visual and Textual Clues for Sentiment,
Neurocomputing, p. 50-59, 2015.
Author Rights 
