References: [1] BaykasogLu, A., KaplanogLu, V., Durmu¸sOgLu, Z.D., S¸ Ahin, C. (2013). Integrating fuzzy dematel and fuzzy hierarchical topsis methods for truck selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(3), 899–907. [2] Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., Johnson, J. C. Analyzing social networks. Sage. [3] Cabrerizo, F. J., P´erez, I. J., Herrera-Viedma, E. (2010). Managing the consensus in group decision making in an unbalanced fuzzy linguistic context with incomplete information. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(2), 169–181. [4] Cabrerizo, F. J., Chiclana, F., Urena, M., Herrera-Viedma, E. (2013). Challenges and open questions in soft consensus models. In: 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS). p 944–949. IEEE. [5] Dalalah, D., Hayajneh, M., Batieha, F. (2011). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for supplier selection. Expert systems with applications, 38(7), 8384–8391. [6] DeGroot, M. H. (1974). Reaching a consensus. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69 (345), 118–121. [7] Fontela, E., Gabus, A. (1974). Dematel, innovative methods. [8] Fontela, E., Gabus, A. (1976). The dematel observer (1976) [9] Friedkin, N. E. (2006). A structural theory of social influence, vol. 13. Cambridge University Press (2006) [10] Friedkin, N. E., Johnsen, E.C. (1990). Social influence and opinions. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 15(3-4), 193– 206. [11] Friedkin, N. E., Johnsen, E. C. (2011). Social influence network theory: A sociological examination of small group dynamics, vol. 33. Cambridge University Press. [12] Gelvez, J., Aldana, F. C., Sep´ulveda, G. (2014). Mining method selection methodology by multiple criteria decision analysis—case study in colombian coal mining. In: International Symposium of the Analytic Hierarchy Process,Washington DC, USA. [13] Harary, F. (1959). A criterion for unanimity in french’s theory of social power. [14] Johnsen, E. Studies in multiobjective decision models. Studentlitteratur Lund. [15] Kamis, N. H., Chiclana, F., Levesley, J. (2019). An influence-driven feedback system for preference similarity network clustering based consensus group decision making model. Information Fusion, 52, 257–267. [16] Katz, L. (1953). A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika, 18(1), 39–43. [17] KerÇsuliene, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (swara). Journal of business economics and management, 11(2), 243–258. [18] Khan, G. F. (2015). Seven Layers of Social Media Analytics: Mining Business Insights from Social Media Text, Actions, Networks, Hyperlinks, Apps, Search Engines, and Location Data. Gohar Feroz Khan. [19] Levine, J. M., Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual review of psychology, 41(1), 585–634. [20] Lin, C. J., Wu, W. W. (2008). A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 205–213. [21] Newcomb, T. M. (1951). Social psychological theory: integrating individual and social approaches. [22] Romero Gelvez, J. I. (2012). Selecci´on de m´etodos extractivos y su impacto en la productividad minera. estudio de caso en la miner´1a de carb´on colombiana (Diciembre 2012) [23] Romero-Gelvez, J. I., Cortes-Aldana, F. A., Franco-Sepulveda, G. (2015). Compromise solutions in mining method selection - case study in colombian coal mining. DYNA, 82, 127–136 (06 2015) [24] Romero-Gelvez, J. I., Garcia-Melon, M. (2016). Influence analysis in consensus search—a multi criteria group decision making approach in environmental management. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15(04), 791–813. [25] Saaty, T. L. (1998). What is the analytic hierarchy process? In: Mathematical models for decision support, p 109–121. Springer. [26] Saaty, T. L., Peniwati, K. (2012). Group decision making: drawing out and reconciling differences. RWS publications. [27] Sabidussi, G. (1966). The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika, 31(4), 581–603. [28] Shannon, C. E., Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication (urbana, il) [29] Simos, J. (1990). Evaluer l’impact sur l’environnement: Une approche originale parl’analyse multicrit‘ere et la n´egociation. In: Evaluer l’impact sur l’environnement: une approche originale par l’analyse multicrit‘ere et la n´egociation. Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes. |