Home| Contact Us| New Journals| Browse Journals| Journal Prices| For Authors|

Print ISSN: 2230 – 8776
Online ISSN:


  About JISM
  DLINE Portal Home
Home
Aims & Scope
Editorial Board
Current Issue
Next Issue
Previous Issue
Sample Issue
Upcoming Conferences
Self-archiving policy
Alert Services
Be a Reviewer
Publisher
Paper Submission
Subscription
Contact us
 
  How To Order
  Order Online
Price Information
Request for Complimentary
Print Copy
 
  For Authors
  Guidelines for Contributors
Online Submission
Call for Papers
Author Rights
 
 
RELATED JOURNALS
Journal of Digital Information Management (JDIM)
Journal of Multimedia Processing and Technologies (JMPT)
International Journal of Web Application (IJWA)

 

 
Journal of Information & Systems Management (JISM)

Retrieval Efficiency of Search Engines on Medical Tourism in Kerala: A Webometric Analysis
Thanuskodi S, Naseehath S
Alagappa University Karaikudi India
Abstract: World Wide Web is like an ocean of information; it is not easy to find specific information from it because the web is very huge and growing all the time. So there are certain tools used to search information from the web. They are called search engines. They search through all the web sites and create an index of the information of the web sites and act as a single point to find relevant information. E.g. Google, Yahoo, Bing, Lycos, Info seek etc. Analysis on 8 representative variables form all the subsectors of on Medical Tourism in Kerala, the search engine Lycos retrieves 59% of the total results and stands first followed by Bing in the second position with 37% and Google in third position with only 2% of results . The remaining less than 1% is shared by all Metasearch engines, of these Ixquick stands first with a slight difference from others followed by Dogpile and WebCrawler Analysis of 10 variables on Ayurveda tourism Lycos occupies first place with a high result of 85% and Google in the second position followed by Bing in the third position with a less Percentage of 7 and 6 respectively. Among Metasearch engines Ixquick stands first, followed by WebCrawler and Dogpile.
Keywords: Search Engines, Retrieval Efficiency, Medical Tourism, Webometrics, Internet
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6025/jism/2019/9/3/91-99
Full_Text   PDF 182 KB    Download:   320  times
References:[1] Bar-Ilan (1998). On the overlap, the precision and estimated recall of search engines: A case study of the query “Erdos”. Scientometrics,42 (2) 207-208 [2] Bharat, K., & Broder, A. (1998). A technique for measuring the relative size and overlap of public Web search engines. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30 (1–7) 379–388. [3] Chignell, M. H., Gwizdka, J., Bodner, R. C. (1999). Discriminating meta-search: A framework for evaluation. Information Processing and Management, 35, 337–362. [4] Chowdhury, G. G. (2002). Information sources and searching on the World Wide Web. Program, 36 (3) 206. [5] Clarke, S. and Willett, P. (1997). Estimating the recall performance of search engines. ASLIB Proceedings, 49 (7) 184-189. [6] Ding, W., Marchionini, G. (1996). A comparative study of the Web search service Performance. In: Proceedings of the ASIS 1996 Annual Conference, October, 33, 136-142. [7] Leighton, H. and Srivastava, J. (1997).Precision among WW search services (search engines ): Alta Vista, Excite, HotBot, Infoseek and Lycos. Retrieved December 15, 2014 from http://www.winona.edu/library/webind.htm.

Home | Aim & Scope | Editorial Board | Author Guidelines | Publisher | Subscription | Previous Issue | Contact Us |Upcoming Conferences|Sample Issues|Library Recommendation Form|

 

Copyright 2011 dline.info