| References: [1] Horkoff, J., Aydemir, F. B., Cardoso, E., Li, T., Maté, A., Paja, E., Salnitri, M., Piras, L., Mylopoulos, J., Giorgini, P. (2019). Goal132
oriented requirements engineering: an extended systematic mapping study. Requirements Engineering. 24, 133–160. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s00766-017-0280-z.
[2] Lamsweerde, A. van., Darimont, R., Letier, E. (1998). Managing conflicts in goal-driven requirements engineering. IEEE
Transactions on Software Engineering. 24, 908–926. https://doi.org/10.1109/32.730542.
[3] Daun, M., Stenkova, V., Krajinski, L., Brings, J., Bandyszak, T., Weyer, T. (2019). Goal Modeling for Collaborative Groups of
Cyber-Physical Systems with GRL. In: Proceedings of the 32th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing.
[4] Daun, M., Brings, J., Weyer, T., Tenbergen, B. (2016). Fostering concurrent engineering of cyberphysical systems a proposal
for an ontological context framework. In: 3rd International Workshop on Emerging Ideas and Trends in Engineering of Cyber-
Physical Systems, EITEC@CPSWeek 2016, Vienna, Austria, April 11, 2016. p. 5–10. IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/
10.1109/EITEC.2016.7503689.
[5] Brings, J., Daun, M., Bandyszak, T., Stricker, V., Weyer, T., Mirzaei, E., Neumann, M., Zernickel, J. S. (2019). Model-based
documentation of dynamicity constraints for collaborative cyber-physical system architectures: Findings from an industrial
case study. Journal of Systems Architecture. 97, 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2019.02.012.
[6] Mosterman, P. J., Zander, J. (2016). Cyber-physical systems challenges: a needs analysis for collaborating embedded software
systems. Software and Systems Modeling. 15, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-015-0469-x.
[7] Tenbergen, B., Daun, M., Obe, P. A., Brings, J. (2018). View-Centric Context Modeling to Foster the Engineering of Cyber-
Physical System Networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture, ICSA 2018, Seattle, WA, USA, April 30
- May 4, 2018. p. 206–216. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA.2018.00030.
[8] Broy, M., Schmidt, A. (2014). Challenges in Engineering Cyber-Physical Systems. Computer, 47, 70–72. https://doi.org/
10.1109/MC.2014.30.
[9] Daun, M., Brings, J., Bandyszak, T., Bohn, P., Weyer, T. (2015). Collaborating Multiple System Instances of Smart Cyberphysical
Systems: A Problem Situation, Solution Idea, and Remaining Research Challenges. In: Bures, T., Weyns, D., Klein, M.,
and Haber, R.E. (eds.) 1st IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Software Engineering for Smart Cyber-Physical Systems,
SEsCPS 2015, Florence, Italy, May 17, 2015. p. 48–51. IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEsCPS.2015.17.
[10] Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S., Eisenecker, U. (2005). Formalizing cardinality-based feature models and their specialization.
Software Process Improvement and Practice. 10, 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/spip.213.
[11] Daun, M., Brings, J., Obe, P. A., Weiß, S., Böhm, B., Unverdorben, S. (2019). Using View-Based Architecture Descriptions to
Aid in Automated Runtime Planning for a Smart Factory. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture
Companion (ICSA-C). p. 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00043.
[12] Borba, C., Silva, C. (2009). A Comparison of Goal-Oriented Approaches to Model Software Product Lines Variability. In:
Heuser, C.A. and Pernul, G. (eds.) Advances in Conceptual Modeling - Challenging Perspectives. p. 244–253. Springer Berlin
Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04947-7_30.
[13] Silva, C., Alencar, F., Araújo, J., Moreira, A., Castro, J. (2008). Tailoring an Aspectual Goal-Oriented Approach to Model
Features. SEKE 2008. 472–477.
[14] Semmak, F., Gnaho, C., Laleau, R. (2008). Extended Kaos to Support Variability for Goal Oriented Requirements Reuse.
MoDISE-EUS.
[15] Semmak, F., Laleau, R., Gnaho, C. (2009). Supporting variability in goal-based requirements. In: 2009 Third International
Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science. p. 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2009.5089287.
[16] Liu, Yanji., Su, Yukun., Yin, Xinshang., Mussbacher, G. (2014). Combined propagation-based reasoning with goal and feature
models. In: 2014 IEEE 4th International Model-Driven Requirements Engineering Workshop (MoDRE). p. 27–36. https://doi.org/
10.1109/MoDRE.2014.6890823.
[17] Liu, Yanji., Su, Yukun., Yin, Xinshang., Mussbacher, G. (2014). Combined goal and feature model reasoning with the User
Requirements Notation and jUCMNav. In: 2014 IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE). p. 321–322.
https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2014.6912277.
[18] Santos, E., Castro, J., Sanchez, J., Pastor, O. (2010). A Goal-Oriented Approach for Variability in BPMN. WER.
[19] Yu, Y., Leite, do Prado, J. C. S., Lapouchnian, A., Mylopoulos, J. (2008). Configuring Features with Stakeholder Goals. In:
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. p. 645–649. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/
10.1145/1363686.1363840.
[20] Yu, Y., Lapouchnian, A., Liaskos, S., Mylopoulos, J., Leite, J. C. S. P. (2008). From Goals to High- Variability Software Design.
In: An, A., Matwin, S., Ras, Z. W., and Slezak, D. (eds.) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. p. 1–16. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68123-6_1.
[21] Asadi, M., Bagheri, E., Gaševi, D., Hatala, M., Mohabbati, B. (2011). Goal-driven Software Product Line Engineering. In:
Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. p. 691–698. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2011). https://doi.org/
10.1145/1982185.1982336.
[22] Gonzales-Baixauli, B., Leite, J. C. S. P., Mylopoulos, J. (2004). Visual variability analysis for goal models. In: Proceedings.
12th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, p. 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRE.2004.1335677.
[23] António, S., Araújo, J., Silva, C. (2009). Adapting the i* Framework for Software Product Lines. In: Heuser, C.A. and Pernul,
G. (eds.) Advances in Conceptual Modeling - Challenging Perspectives. p. 286–295. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://
doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04947-7_34.
[24] Silva, C., Borba, C., Castro, J. (2011). A Goal Oriented Approach to Identify and Configure Feature Models for Software
Product Lines. WER. (2011).
[25] Noorian, M., Bagheri, E., Du, W. (2014). From Intentions to Decisions: Understanding Stakeholders’ Objectives in Software
Product Line Configuration. International Conference on Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering. 671–677.
[26] Noorian, M., Bagheri, E., Du, W. (2017). Toward automated quality-centric product line configuration using intentional
variability. Journal of Software Evolution and Process. 29, e1870. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1870.
[27] Guedes, G., Silva, C., Soares, M. (2017). Comparing Configuration Approaches for Dynamic Software Product Lines. In:
Proceedings of the 31st Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering. p. 134–143. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/
10.1145/3131151.3131162.
[28] Ali, R., Dalpiaz, F., Giorgini, P. (2013). Reasoning with contextual requirements: Detecting inconsistency and conflicts.
Information and Software Technology. 55, 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.06.013.
[29] Asadi, M., Gröner, G., Mohabbati, B., Gaševi, D. (2016). Goal-oriented modeling and verification of feature-oriented product
lines. Software and Systems Modeling. 15, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-014-0402-8.
[30] Lapouchnian, A., Mylopoulos, J. (2011). Capturing contextual variability in i* models. In: Proceedings of the 5th International
i* Workshop. p. 96–101.
[31] Lapouchnian, A., Mylopoulos, J. (2009). Modeling Domain Variability in Requirements Engineering with Contexts. In:
Laender, A. H. F., Castano, S., Dayal, U., Casati, F., and de Oliveira, J. P. M. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling - ER 2009. p. 115–130.
Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04840-1_11. |
