<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record>
  <title>A Basic Comparative Framework for Evaluation of Digital Identifier Systems</title>
  <journal>Electronic Devices</journal>
  <author>Hamid Reza Khedmatgozar, Mehdi Alipour-Hafezi</author>
  <volume>4</volume>
  <issue>2</issue>
  <year>2015</year>
  <doi></doi>
  <url>http://www.dline.info/ed/fulltext/v4n2/v4n2_2.pdf</url>
  <abstract>In recent years, with the development of digital environment, one of the concepts that have been particularly
important is digital identification of objects in this environment by digital identifier systems. The main objective of this study
is to answer this important and basic question: How and on what framework can distinguish a digital object identifier system
from other identifier systems? To achieve this goal, a comparative framework which consisted of 7 main characteristics of
digital identifiers in three major domains (namely identifier features, digital coverage and comprehensiveness of scope) was
proposed. Then, an illustrative comparison of 23 well-known worldwide identifiers was carried out. Results of this study
revealed that six identifier systems of DOI, Handle, UCI, ARK, URN and PURL can be regarded as the best choices of digital
identifiers in public areas identified in the digital space and four identifier systems of ORCID, MIRIAM, ISNI and NBN are the
best options to be used in certain specialized areas. These results can help information technology specialists to identify and
effectively use of digital identifier systems in actual and potential practical areas.</abstract>
</record>
