Scholarly Literature in Digital Humanities: A Comparative Analysis of Open Access and Non-Open Access Publications
Sandra M K, Rupesh Kumar A
International Journal of Information Studies, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2025.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6025/ijis/2025/17/1/29-40
Link: https://www.dline.info/ijis/fulltext/v17n1/ijisv17n1_5.pdf
Abstract:
Digital Humanities (DH), as a research area, has attracted the attention of scholars across the globe. The
present study attempts to trace the publication and citation trends in DH literature with a comparative analysis
of Open Access (OA) and Non-Open Access (Non-OA) publications using a dataset of 3,731 publications collected
from Scopus. DH literature is characterized by a steady growth from 1971 to 2024. The highest number of
publications have been produced during 2022 (475). Although a consistent increase in OA publications can be
witnessed since 2009, a significant portion of DH literature (65%) is non-open access. In terms of citations, OA
publications show greater potential. Mann Whitney U test shows that the mean rank of citation counts for OA
publications (2036.47) is higher than that of non-OA publications (1772.56). The result is statistically significant
(p-value=.000). Green OA is the most preferred OA channel, with 27% of OA publications. USA is the top
contributor to DH literature with 23% of publications, while Belgium tops the list with 62% open access
publication output. Computer Science (48%) is the most predominant subject area in DH. Articles and
conference papers constitute 86% of the total literature, indicating authors' preference for scholarly
communication.