<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record>
  <title>Comprehensibility of Classification Treesâ€“Survey Design</title>
  <journal>Information Security Education Journal</journal>
  <author>Rok Piltaver, Mitja LuÅ¡trek, Matjaz Gams, Sanda Martincic â€“ IpÅ¡ic</author>
  <volume>6</volume>
  <issue>1</issue>
  <year>2019</year>
  <doi>https://doi.org/10.6025/isej/2019/6/1/15-20</doi>
  <url>http://www.dline.info/isej/fulltext/v6n1/isejv6n1_3.pdf</url>
  <abstract>Comprehensibility is the decisive factor for application of classifiers in practice. However, most algorithms that
learn comprehensible classifiers use classification model size as a metric that guides the search in the space of all possible
classifiers instead of comprehensibility - which is ill-defined. Several surveys have shown that such simple complexity metrics
do not correspond well to the comprehensibility of classification trees. This paper therefore suggests a classification tree
comprehensibility survey in order to derive an exhaustive comprehensibility metrics better reflecting the human sense of
classifier comprehensibility and obtain new insights about comprehensibility of classification trees.</abstract>
</record>
