
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record>
  <title>An Analysis of Prepositional-Phrase Attachment Disambiguation</title>
  <journal>International Journal of Computational Linguistics Research</journal>
  <author>Mohammed H. Hamdan, Imtiaz H. Khan</author>
  <volume>9</volume>
  <issue>2</issue>
  <year>2018</year>
  <doi>https://doi.org/10.6025/jcl/2018/9/2/60-80</doi>
  <url>http://www.dline.info/jcl/fulltext/v9n2/jclv9n2_2.pdf</url>
  <abstract>Prepositional-phrase (PP) attachment ambiguity is a pervasive problem in natural language processing, and
at times it poses significant challenges to a computer system to resolve this ambiguity. In literature, different approaches have
been proposed to address PP-attachment ambiguity, but to the best of our knowledge, there is no published work which
surveys such approaches. This survey paper compares the standard methods that attempt to resolve PP-attachment ambiguities
in natural language processing. We also provide a taxonomy of various ambiguities, which may arise at different levels
during the language-processing task. There are two methods employed in natural language processing concerning new
approaches: the first technique called the rule-based method and the second called statistical approach.</abstract>
</record>
