@article{2117,
  author = {Pavel Sergeyevich Ptitsyn, Dmitry Vladimirovich Radko, Alexey Vasilevich Skrypnikov},
  title = {Development of the Method for Integration of Mobile Applications and Corporate Information Systems},
  journal = {Journal of Digital Information Management},
  year = {2016},
  volume = {14},
  number = {5},
  doi = {},
  url = {http://dline.info/fpaper/jdim/v14i5/jdimv14i5_5.pdf},
  abstract = {To develop the methodological
recommendations based on the concept of intellectual capital
for the subjective evaluation of the importance of its
components for a particular business and their vulnerability
to risks leading to a decrease in the value of intellectual
capital with the information technology is proposed.
Using the morphological analysis technique, the authors
highlight the key components of intellectual capital that
are valued in terms of utility and rarity. Using questionnaire,
a survey carried out in the form of interviews with 72
representatives of small, medium-sized and large
business; the importance of structural components of
intellectual capital has been identified for different size
businesses and influence of information technology, as
well as the distribution of risks of utilityand rarity loss has
been obtained depending on types of intellectual capital.
The differences in the structure of the intellectual capital
of small, medium-sized and large organizations of the
Rostov region, associated with the increase of the
importance of organizational capital with the consolidation
of the organization, are identified. It is established that
the greatest concerns among respondents is associated
with the risk of utility loss of existing intangible assets,
while risks, leading to the loss of rarity, are not perceived
as serious danger.
The results of the study allow defining strategic pathways
to invest funds in maintaining and increasing the value of
intellectual capital using the risk-based approach.
Intangible assets,which are identified as most important,
as well as loss of their value to the specific organization,
vulnerable to the risks, should become priorities in the
intellectual capital cost management.},
}