Journal of Information Organization


Vol No. 11 ,Issue No. 2 2021

The Computational Models for Inductive Reasoning
Milos Ilic, Vladimir Stankovic
College of Agriculture and Food Technology Cirila i Metodija 1, 18400 Prokuplje Serbia., Faculty of Electronic Engineering at the University of Nis Aleksandra Medvedeva 14, 18000 Nis’ Serbia
Abstract: In this review, we have analysed and critically evaluated the inductive reasoning models. In the inductive reasoning, we draw conclusions which are not logically valid. In general, it is applied to make likely but not certain predictions about how people will behave in new environments. We in this paper, discussed and described the computational models and the basics of inductive reasoning. We have discussed how to implement and present how the models work, and give their positive and negative sides.
Keywords: Inductive Reasoning, Similarity Effects, Typicality Effects, Bayesian Model, Computational Modeling The Computational Models for Inductive Reasoning
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6025/jio/2021/11/2/35-40
Full_Text   PDF 203 KB   Download:   161  times
References:

[1] Sun, R. (2008). The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, New York.
[2] Weber, M., Osherson, D. (2014). Category-based induction from similarity of neural activation, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14 (1) 24-36.
[3] Holyoak, K., Seung Lee, H., Lu, H. (2010). Analogical and Category-Based Inference: A Theoretical Integration With Bayesian Causal Models, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139 (4) 702–727.
[4] Tenenbaum, J., Kemp, C., Shafto, P. Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive reasoning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
[5] Medin, L., Coley, D., Storms, G., Hayes, K. (2003). A relevance theory of induction, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 517–532.
[6] Griffiths, O., Hayes, B., Newell, B. (2012). Feature-based versus category-based induction with uncertain Categories, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38 (3), 576.
[7] Rogers, T., McClelland, L. (2004). Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
[8] Tenenbaum, J., Griffiths, T., Kemp, C. (2006). Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning, TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 10 (7) 309-318.
[9] Sakamoto, K., Nakagawa, M. (2007). Risk Context Effects in Inductive Reasoning: An Experimental and Computational Modeling Study, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-21-1 Ookayama, Meguroku, Tokyo, Japan, p. 425-438.
[10] Ashby, G., Maddox, T. (1993). Relations between prototype, exemplar, and decision bound models of categorization, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 37, 372–400.
[11] Sakamoto, K., Nakagawa, M. (2006). The Effects of negative premise on Inductive reasoning: A psychological experiment and computational modeling study, In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, p. 2081–2086.
[12] Hayes, B., Fritz, K., Heit, E. (2013). The relationship between memory and inductive reasoning: Does it develop?, Developmental Psychology, 49 (5) 848-860.
[13] Ifenthaler, D., Seel, N. (2013). Model-based reasoning, Computers & Education an International Journal, Volume 64, 131–142, (May).
[14] Hayes, B., Heit, E. (2013). How similar are recognition memory and inductive reasoning?, Memory & Cognition, Volume 41 (5), p 781-795, 2013.
[15] Bharadwaj, A., Minz, S. (2014). Inductive-Analytical Learning based Stepwise Support Vector Machine (SVM) Model, International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE), 4, Issue-ICCIN-2K14, 2014.
[16] Heussen, D., Voorspoels, W., Storms, G. (2010). Can similarity-based models of induction handle negative evidence?, Cognitive Science Society, p. 2033—2038.