@article{4159,
  author = {M. Krishnamurthy, Tejas, K. M },
  title = {Comparative Analysis of Research Management Tools: EndNote, Mendeley, Zotero, Paperpile, RefWorks, and Citavi},
  journal = {Journal of Information & Systems Management},
  year = {2024},
  volume = {14},
  number = {4},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6025/jism/2024/14/4/131-137},
  url = {https://www.dline.info/jism/fulltext/v14n4/jismv14n4_1.pdf},
  abstract = {Reference Management Software (RMS) is crucial in assisting scholars, researchers, and professionals organise and cite their research. This paper compares six prominent RMS tools: EndNote, Mendeley, Zotero, Paperpile, RefWorks, and Citavi. The study aims to evaluate these tools based on their features, usability, storage capacity, and compatibility with different operating systems and word processors. Each tool’s unique offerings, such as social networking capabilities in Mendeley and Zotero’s open-source nature, are discussed. Additionally, the paper explores the strengths and weaknesses of each RMS, providing a comprehensive comparison to guide users in selecting the most suitable software for their needs. The findings indicate that while all six tools offer robust reference management features, the choice ultimately depends on individual preferences, specific research requirements, and the user’s computing environment. This study highlights the importance of RMS in enhancing research efficiency and collaboration.},
}