|
Journal of Information Security Research |
A Reduced Feature Representation based Online Signature Authentication | Youssef Elmir, Nasreddine Karour, Souleymane Ouled Jaafri Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Tahri Mohammed of Bechar, Algeria & Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Adrar, Algeria | Abstract: In order to achieve perfection in security field, the biometric recognition has been used as a tool, because it is based on physiological and behavioral characteristics of a person which unlike the traditional prevailing methods of human identification, cannot be forgotten, stolen, eliminated or changed with time. In this paper, a theoretical and general presentation of an online signature based biometric system using a reduced set of features. The authenticity of a signer is determined by comparing an input signature to a stored reference set (template) based on a limited number of simple extracted features like
the total length of the lines, pressure, the distance between the first and the last point, the average of horizontal displacement...etc. The proposed system was compared to QU-PRIP system which used more extracted features, this system which is the winner system in ICDAR2011 Signature Verification Competition. After several experiments, the obtained results show that even though the overall system performance are not very good enough but it is approximately similar to the one of
the QU-PRIP system that uses more extracted features, the fact that affect directly on the total space of representation and the total time necessary for authentication. | Keywords: Handwritten Signature, Biometric Authentication, Dynamic Features, Form Features, Signature Verification Methods, Online Signatures A Reduced Feature Representation based Online Signature Authentication |
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6025/jisr/2019/10/2/39-47 | Full_Text   PDF 743 KB   Download:   68  times | References:[1] Jain, A. K., Ross, A., Prabhakar, S. (2004). An introduction to biometric recognition. Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology. IEEE. 14, 4-20. 10.1109/TCSVT.2003.818349, 30 January 2004.
[2] Al-maadeed, S, et al. (2012). Arabic signature verification dataset. In: Proceedings of the International Arab Conference on Information Technology.
[3] Karour, N., Ouled Jaafri, S. (2013). Online Signature Based Biometric System. University of Adrar, BSc thesis, 2013.
[4] Martens, R., Claesen, L. (1997). Dynamic programming optimisation for on-line signature verification. In: Proceedings of the fourth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. IEEE. 2. 653-656.
[5] Martens, R., Claesen, L. (1996). On-line signature verification by dynamic time-warping. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE. (3) 38-42.
[6] Phillips, P., et al. (1996). FERET (face recognition technology) recognition algorithm development and test results. Adelphi University, 1996.
[7] Nalwa, V., S. (1997). Automatic on-line signature verification. In: IEEE. 85 (2) 215-239.
[8] Struc, V., Pavešic, N. (2010). The complete gabor-fisher classifier for robust face recognition. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing.
[9] Struc, V., Paveši, N. (2009). Gabor-based kernel partial-least-squares discrimination features for face recognition. Informatica, 20, 115-138.
[10] Elmir, Y., Elberrichi, Z., Adjoudj, R. (2014). Multimodal Biometric Using a Hierarchical Fusion of a Person’s Face, Voice, and Online Signature. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 10, 555-567.
[11] De Maesschalck, R., Jouan-Rimbaud, D., Massart, L., D. (2000). The mahalanobis distance. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 50, 1-18.
[12] Gnanadesikan, R., Kettenring, R., J. (1972). Robust estimates, residuals, and outlier detection with multiresponse data, Biometrics, 81-124.
[13] Hassaïne, A., Al-Maadeed, S. (2012). An online signature verification system for forgery and disguise detection. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing. Springer. 552-559. Berlin, Heidelberg. 2012. |
|
|
|