References: [1] Musa, S.M. et al. (2006). Utilization of buffers for performance evaluation of local area network protocol, Communication of the International Information Management Association [Journal], 6, 19–33. [2] Akhatr, S., Ahmed, E., Saha, A.K. & Arefin, K.S. (2010) Performance analysis of integrated service over differentiated service for next generation Internet. JCIT, 1, 95–101. [3] Miaji, Y. & Hassan, S. (2010) Comparative simulation of scheduling mechanism in packet switching network IEEE Second International Conference on Network Applications, Protocols and Services, pp. 141–147. [4] Velmurugan, T., Chandra, H. & Balaji, S. (2009) Comparison of queuing disciplines for differentiated services using OPNET IEEE International Conference on Advances in Recent Technologies in Communication and Computing, pp. 744–746. [5] Ghaffar Pour Rahbar, A.G.P. & Yang, O. (2009) LGRR: A new packet scheduling algorithm for differentiated services packetswitched networks. Computer Communications, 32, 357–367 [DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2008.11.007]. [6] Karim, A. (2011) VoIP performance over different service classes under various scheduling techniques. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5, 1416–1422. [7] Subash, T. & Indiragandhi, S. (2006) “Performance analysis of scheduling disciplines in optical networks, IEEE Proceeding of Third International Conference on Wireless and Optical Communication Networks, p.-5. [8] Klampfer, S., Mohorko, J. & Cucej, Z. (2009) Impact of hybrid queuing discipline on the VoIP traffic delay. Elektrotehniski Vestnik (Electrotechnical Review), 76, 133–138. [9] M Gospodinow. The Effect of Different Queuing Disciplines over FTP [Video], and VoIP performance, International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, pp. 1–5 (2004). [10] Rashed, M.M.G. & Kabir, M. (2010) A comparative study of different queuing techniques in VoIP, video conferencing and file transfer. Daffodil International University Journal of Science and Technology, 5, 37–47 [DOI: 10.3329/diujst.v5i1.4380]. |