<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record>
  <title>Social Sciences and Humanities in Post- Soviet Period in Russia: Bibliometric Analysis, 1993-2022</title>
  <journal>Journal of Science and Technology Metrics </journal>
  <author>Valentina Markusova, Valentina Tsvetkova, Anna Zolotova, Natalia Kotelâ€™nikova, Alexander Libkind</author>
  <volume>4</volume>
  <issue>3</issue>
  <year>2023</year>
  <doi>https://doi.org/10.6025/stm/2023/4/3/79-89</doi>
  <url>https://www.dline.info/jstm/fulltext/v4n3/jstmv4n3_1.pdf</url>
  <abstract>Weâ€™ve investigated the 30-year trends in Social Sciences &amp; Humanities (SS&amp;H) and STEM development in Russia and global science. Our analysis covers interdisciplinary intersections of SS&amp;H with other fields. Weâ€™ve evaluated Russian SS&amp;H research impact using citation metrics via Web of Scienceâ€™s Core Collection and InCites tool. Notably, STEM publications declined while SS&amp;H grew in Russia and globally. Examining research productivity using â€˜citation topics,â€™ we found a significant link between â€˜6. Social Sciencesâ€™ and â€˜1. Clinical &amp; Life Sciencesâ€™ both in Russia and worldwide for the period 2018-2022. Our data highlights a significant similarity within the top 15 topics between Russia and the global scientific community in this specific area.
The citation indicators for the three selected Scientific Categories (â€˜Economics and Business,â€™ â€˜Psychology/Psychology,â€™ and â€˜Social Sciences, Multi-disciplinaryâ€™) linked with SS&amp;H in InCites highlight a notably high value for the period 2018-2022. These values reflect the high quality of performance by Russian scholars.
Over the past decade in Russia, there has been a noticeable decline in the prevalence of single authorship across all studied scientific disciplines, with varying rates of change. In the three studied fields, teams of 2 to 5 members were common. Notably, in â€˜Economicsâ€™, 84.5% of teams fell within this range, indicating that 74% of international collaborative publications in â€˜Economicsâ€™ involve teams of 2-5 individuals.
Our data presents valuable insights into the landscape of Russian scientific research in Social Science &amp; Humanities over a thirty-year period. These findings could curry significance for science policy specialists and the broader scientific community.</abstract>
</record>
