| References:
[1] Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., Di Costa, F. (2023). USA vs. Russia in the scientific arena. PLoS ONE, 18(7), e0288152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288152
[2] Adams, J., Quashi, J. E., Pendlebury, D., Szomszor, M. (2020). Global research report: Multi-authorship and research analytics 2020. Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/lp/global-research-report-multi-authorship-and-research-analytics
[3] De Beaver, D., Rosen, A. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration - Part 1. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1(1), 65-84.
[4] Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21688
[5] Garfield, E. (1982). Why aren’t there more women in science? Essays of an Information Scientist, 5, 498-500. Retrieved from https://garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v5p498y1981-82.pdf
[6] Gilyarevskii, R. S., Libkind, A. N., Markusova, V. A. (2019). Dynamics of Russian publication activity, 1993-2017, based on Web of Science data. Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics, 53(2), 51–63.
[7] Gilyarevskii, R. S., Libkind, A. N., Libkind, I. A. (2022). Investigation of references in citing publications by Web of Science Core Collection. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Series 2(7), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.36535/0548-0027-2022-07-3
[8] Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2005). Domesticity and internationality in co-authorship, references, and citations. Scientometrics, 65(3), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0277-0
[9] Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69–115. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010512628145
[10] González-Salmón, E., Robinson-Garcia, N. (2024). A call for transparency in gender assignment approaches. Scientometrics, 129(1), 2451–2454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04995-4
[11] Lawler, M., Oliver, K., Philip, R., Lewison, G. (2023). Gender inequity in cancer research leadership in Europe: Time to act. European Journal of Cancer, 194(1), 113345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113345
[12] Lewison, G., Markusova, V. (2011). Female researchers in Russia: Have they become more visible? Scientometrics, 89(1), 139-152.
[13] Lewison, G., Roe, P., Sharp, H., Sullivan, R. (2023). The sex (or gender) of biomedical researchers in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries in 2009 and 2019. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Science & Technology Metrics (STMet 2023), November 16-17, 2023, BITS Pilani, Dubai, UAE. Retrieved from https://dline.info/newl/STMProceedings
[14] Li, W., Aste, T., Caccioli, F. (2019). Early co-authorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers. Nature Communications, 10(1), 5170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13130-4
[15] Libkind, I. A., Markusova, V. A., Terekhov, I., Rubval’ter, R. A., Libkind, A. N. (2014). Bibliometric analysis of competitive research project results. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 41(4), 254–264.
[16] Markusova, V., Minin, V., Mirabyan, L., Arapov, M. (1999). Policy for distribution of grants in new Russia in 1993-1994 by two funding agencies: The International Science Foundation and the Russian Foundation of Basic Research. Research Evaluation, 8(1), 53–59.
[17] Mindeli, L. E., Libkind, A. N., Markusova, V. A. (2014). The effect of grant-assisted financing on the efficiency of scientific studies in higher education. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 84(6), 432–440.
[18] Mindeli, L. E., Ivanov, V. A., Libkind, A. N., Markusova, V. A. (2016). Bibliometric approach to analyzing the co-authorship network of Russian researchers, 2006-2013. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 8, 14–23.
[19] Moed, H. F., Markusova, V., Akoev, M. (2018). Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. Scientometrics, 116, 1153–1180.
[20] Mutebi, M., et al. (2024). Sex and authorship in global cancer research. BMJ Oncology, 3, e000200. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000200
[21] Pilkina, M., Lovakov, A. (2022). Gender disparities in Russian academia: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 127(6), 3577-3591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04383-w
[22] Rossi, R. E., A La Salvia, R., Modica, R., Spada, F. (2024). Authorship of Italian medical literature on neuroendocrine neoplasms: Any gender gap? Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-024-02347-w
[23] Savchenko, E., Rosenfeld, A. (2024). Authorship conflicts in academia: An international cross-discipline survey. Scientometrics, 129, 2101–2121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04972-
[24] Shokida, N. S., Kozlowski, D., Larivière, V. (2024). Construction of a bibliometric dataset on gender studies. SCT Proceedings in Interdisciplinary Insights and Innovations, 2(1), 316. https://doi.org/10.56294/piii2024316
[25] Subbotin, A., Aref, S., et al. (2021). Brain drain and brain gain in Russia: Analyzing international migration of researchers by discipline using Scopus bibliometric data 1996–2020. Scientometrics, 126, 7875–7900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04091-x
[26] Tekles, A., Borrmann, L. (2020). Author name disambiguation of bibliometric data: A comparison of several unsupervised approaches. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(4), 1510–1528. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00081
[27] Thelwall, M., Maflahi, N. N. (2022). Research co-authorship 1900–2020: Continuous, universal, and ongoing expansion. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(2), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00188
[28] Wislar, J. S., Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P. B., DeAngelis, C. D. (2011). Honorary and ghost authorship in high-impact biomedical journals: A cross-sectional survey. BMJ, 343, d6128. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6128
|
