References: [1] Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-Citation Analysis, Bibliographic Coupling, and Direct Citation: Which Citation Approach Represents the Research Front Most Accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12) 2389-2404.
[2] Chen C. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. – 2006. – Vol. 57, 13. – P. 359–377.
[3] Cheng, Q. K., Wang, J. M., Lu, W., Huang, Y., & Bu, Y. (2020). Keyword-citation-keyword network: a new perspective of discipline knowledge structure analysis. Scientometrics, 124 (3) 1923-1943.
[4] Cui, Y., Wang, S., Gao, X., Yang, H., Cao, X. (2018). Detecting and Characterizing Research Fronts Topics Based on Global-Micro Model. Library and Information Service. 62 (15), 75-82.
[5] Kontostathis, A., Galitsky, L., Pottenger, W. M., Roy, S., Phelps, D. J. (2004). A survey of emerging trend detection in textual data mining. A comprehensive survey of text mining / M. Berry (Ed.). - Heidelberg: Springer, 2004, 185–224.
[6] Marshakova, I. V. (1981). Citation networks in information-science. Scientometrics, 3 (1) 13-25.
[7] Mokhnacheva, Y. V., & Tsvetkova, V. A. (2021). Development of Research Topics Based on the Terminological Approach (for Example, Immunology and Microbiology According to Scopus-SciVal Data). Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 48 (2) 139-145.
[8] Mokhnacheva, Yu. V., Tsvetkova, V. A. (2022). Russian publications on Library and Information Sciences in Scopus. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki - Scientific and technical libraries. (in press).
[9] Roche, I., Besagni, D., Francois, C., Horlesberger, M., Schiebel, E. (2010). Identification and characterisation of technological topics in the field of Molecular Biology. Scientometrics. 82 (3) 663-676.
[10] Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 24 (4) 265–269.
[11] Small, H. (1997). Update on science mapping: Creating large document spaces. Scientometrics, 38 (2) 75-293.
[12] Small, H., & Garfield, E. (1985). The geography of science - disciplinary and national mappings. Journal of Information Science, 11(4) 147-159.
[13] Wang, X. G., Cheng, Q. K., & Lu, W. (2014). Analyzing evolution of research topics with NEViewer: a new method based on dynamic co-word networks. Scientometrics, 101 (2) 1253-1271.
[14] Xia, W. J., Jiang, Y. P., Zhu, W. F., Zhang, S., & Li, T. R. (2021). Research Fronts of Computer Science: A Scientometric Analysis. Journal of Scientometric Research, 10 (1) 18-26.
|