| References: [1] Amirhosseini, Maziar (2016). Analysis of concept structure and semantic relations based on graph-independent structural analysis, Ph. D. Dissertation. Faculty of Information Sciences and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 388 p.
[2] Amirhosseini, Maziar and Salim, Juhana (2019). A Synthesis Survey of Ontology Evaluation Tools, Applications and Methods to Propose a Novel Branch in Evaluating the Structure of Ontologies: Graph-independent Approach. International Journal of Computer (IJC), 33 (1), pp 46-68.
[3] Burgin, M. (1995) The phenomenon of knowledge, Philosophical and Sociological Thought, No. 3–4, pp. 41–63.
[4] Burgin, M. (1997) Fundamental Structures of Knowledge and Information, Ukrainian Academy of Information Sciences, Kiev (in Russian). Structures and Processes. New Jersey: World Scientific Series in Information Studies, pp. 45-168.
[5] Burgin, M. (2004) Data, information, and knowledge, Information,v.7, No. 1, pp. 47–57.
[6] Burgin, Mark (2017) Chapter 4: Knowledge Structure and Functioning: Microlevel or Quantum Theory of Knowledge, In Theory of Knowledge Structures and Processes. New Jersey: World Scientific Series in Information Studies, pp. 307-394.
[7] Burgin, Mark (2017a) Chapter 2: Knowledge Characteristics and Typology, In Theory of Knowledge Structures and Processes. New Jersey: World Scientific Series in Information Studies, pp. 45-168.
[8] Burgin, Mark (2017b) Chapter 5: Knowledge Structure and Functioning: Macrolevel or Theory of Average Knowledge, In Theory of Knowledge Structures and Processes. New Jersey: World Scientific Series in Information Studies, pp. 395-592.
[9] Burridge, Kate and Stebbins, Tonya N. (2020) For the Love of Language: An Introduction to Linguistics. London: Cambridge University press.
[10] Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the hard problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2(3), 200-219.
[11] Chung, Wingyan (2010) Web Searching and Browsing: A Multilingual Perspective. In Advances in Computers, Volume 78, 2010, pp 41-69.
[12] De Silva, Sisira T. (2008). An ontology to medel time in clinical practice guideline. Master of Health Informatics, Dalhousie University.
[13] Gangemi, A., Catenacci, C., Ciaramita, M. & Lehmann, J. 2005. A theoretical framework for ontology evaluation and validation. Proceedings of SWAP2005.
[14] Gordon, Timpson Christopher (2004) Quantum Information Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Thesis or the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Oxford:University of Oxford
[15] Horri, Abbas (2008). An Introduction to informology: Functions and Applications. Tehran: Dama; Ketabdar.
[16] Jacobs, Joachim (2001). The dimensions of topic–comment. In: Linguistics 39 : 641–81.
[17] Khrennikov, A. (2016) ‘‘Social Laser’: action amplification by stimulated emission of social energy’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374: 20150094.
[18] Kuroda, Shige-yuki (2005). Focusing on the matter of topic: A study of wa and ga in Japanese. In: Journal of East Asian Linguistics 14 : 1–58.
[19] Lu, Q. 2006. OntoKBEval: A Support Tool for OWL Ontology evaluation. Master of computer science, Concordia University.Nielsen, Michael A. (2010). Quantum computation and quantum information. Chuang, Isaac L. (10th anniversary ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[19] Russell, B. (1903) Principles of Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[20] Sasse, Hans-Jürgen (1987). The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. In: Linguistics 25 : 511–80.
[21] Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423, 623-656. Retrieved from http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/ms/what/shannonday/shannon1948.pdf
[22] Simperl, E. 2009. Reusing ontologies on the Semantic Web: A feasibility study. Data & Knowledge Engineering 68: 905–925. [Online] http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/fileadmin/documents/articles/reusing_ontologies.pdf
[23] Smuts, Jan Christiaan (1926) Holism and evolution. New York: The Macmillan company, 362 p.
[24] Sowa, J. F. 2008. Conceptual Graphs. Handbook of Knowledge Representation edited by F. van Harmelen, V. Lifschitz and B. Porter. London: Elsevier.
[25] Von Heusinger, Klaus (2002)Information structure and the partition of sentence meaning. Prague Linguistic Circle Papers, E. Hajicová, P. Sgall, T. Hoskovec & P. Sgall (eds.). Amsterdam: Philadelphia: Benjamins, pp 275-305
[26] Zhuge, H. (2004) China’s e-science knowledge grid environment, IEEE Intelligent Systems, v. 19, No. 1, pp. 13–17.
[27] Zhuge, H. (2010) Interactive semantics, Artiûcial Intelligence, v. 174, pp. 190–204.
[28] Zhuge, H. (2012) The Knowledge Grid: Toward Cyber-Physical Society, World Scientiûc Publishing Co.
[29] Zhuge, H. and Shi, X. (2003) Fighting epidemics in the information and knowledge age, IEEE Computer, v. 36, No. 10, pp. 114–116.
[30] Zhuge, H. and Shi, X. (2004) Toward the eco-grid: A harmoniously evolved interconnection environment, Communications of the ACM, v. 47, No. 9, pp. 78–83.
[31]Zhuge, H. and Sun, Y. (2010) The schema theory for semantic link network, Future Generation Computer Systems, v. 26, No. 3, pp. 408–420.
[32]Zhuge, H. and Xu, B. (2011) Basic operations, completeness and dynamicity of cyber physical socio semantic link network CPSocio-SLN, Con-currency and Computation: Practice and Experience, v. 23, No. 9, pp. 924–939.
[33] Zhuge, H. and Zhang, J. (2010) Topological centrality and its applications, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 61, No. 9, pp. 1824–1841. |
