| Abstract: [1] Kosti, D., Milivojevi, Z., Stojanovi, V. (2016). The Evaluation of Speech Intelligibility in the Orthodox Church on the Basis
of MOS Test Intelligibility Logatom Type CCV, ICEST 2016, Ohrid, Macedonia, 153-156.
[2] Kruger, K., Gough, K., Hill, P. (1991). A Comparison of Subjective Speech Intelligibility Test in Reverberant Environments,
Canadian Acoustic, 19 (4) 23 - 4.
[3] Plomp, R., Mimpen, A. M. (1979). Improving the Reliability of Testing the Speech Reception Threshold for Sentences,
Audiology, 18, 43 - 52.
[4] Hagerman, B., Sentences for Testing Speech Intelligibility in Noise, Scand Audio, 11, 79-87.
[5] French, N. R., Steinberg, J. C. (1947). Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 19
(1), 90–119.
[6] Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index, S3.5-1997, ANSI, New York.
[7].Steeneken, H. J. M., Houtgast, T. (1980). A Physical Method for Measuring Speech-Transmission Quality, J. Acoust. Soc.
Amer., 67 (1) 318–326.
[8] Goldsworthy, R. L., Greenberg, J. E. (2004). Analysis of Speech-Based Speech Transmission Index Methods with Implications
for Nonlinear Operations, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 116 (6) 3679–3689.
[9] Tall, C. H., Hendriks, R. C., Heusdens, R., Jensen, J. (2011). An Algorithm for Intelligibility Prediction of Time-Frequency
Weighted Noise Speech, EEE Transactions on audio, speech, and language processing, 19 (7), September.
[10] Milivojevi, Z., Kosti, D., Veli kovi, Z., Brodi, D. (2016). Serbian Sentence Matrix Test for Speech Intelligibility Measurement
in Different Reverberation Conditions, UNITEH Gabrovo II, 173-178. |
