Abstract ChatGPT has emerged as a primary platform in recent months due to its capability of extracting answers to any query or coding requirement in the online platform. Despite the criticism about its functioning, it has penetrated the whole world in a big way. In this work, we studied its web/online impact on different platforms. ChatGPT has emerged as a primary... ChatGPT has emerged as a primary platform in recent months due to its capability of extracting answers to any query or coding requirement in the online platform. Despite the criticism about its functioning, it has penetrated the whole world in a big way. In this work, we studied its web/online impact on different platforms. ChatGPT has emerged as a primary platform in recent months due to its capability of extracting answers to any query or coding requirement in the online platform. Despite the criticism about its functioning, it has penetrated the whole world in a big way. In this work, we studied its web/online impact on different platforms. Read More Read Less

Abstract Bibliometrics is an important tool originated in the library and information science community that can be used to measure the research output. Researchers in various fields have extensively used it because of its immense utility. Last year, as COVID-19 hit the globe, researchers of various, be it medical domain, library science, etc., started to perform a chain of bibliometric studies.... Bibliometrics is an important tool originated in the library and information science community that can be used to measure the research output. Researchers in various fields have extensively used it because of its immense utility. Last year, as COVID-19 hit the globe, researchers of various, be it medical domain, library science, etc., started to perform a chain of bibliometric studies. The present study used the SCOPUS database as a source of data and identified 39 bibliometric studies (BS) related to COVID-19. These 39 BS were studied based on two sets of parameters, namely general and granular. The study revealed that though the 39 BS were performed from different points of view. But it was seen that the journal Library Philosophy and Practice had published six among these 39 BS. It was observed that various medical literature oriented databases like MEDLINE and even general databases like WOS, SCOPUS which cover a variety of subjects, were used for the studies. Data was collected using a variety of strings, with a different time-span (50 years, 20 years, 3 months, etc.) in various formats like CSV, XLS, BibTxt, txt, etc. To process, analyze, and visualize the data various software were used like Excel, Python, SPSS, VOsviewer, CiteSpace to name a few. The number of articles varied because of the number of databases adopted, purpose, time-span and even the string used for the study. The most dominant document type was an article and the most productive subject area was medicine or virology. In 13 studies, it was observed that the University of Hong Kong was the most productive organization, and Yuen Kwok-yung was their most productive author. 20 BS found the most article producing countries was USA, whereas 13 found China to be the most prolific. 8 BS found the Journal of virology as the most producing source, whereas 3 BS found the Journal of Medical Virology the most producing source. For the collaboration network, various elements authors/countries/organizations/keywords/co-citations/citations were used to create the visualization network. Read More Read Less

Abstract The aim of this paper was to identify and analyse the most highly cited research articles, and authorships levels in the discipline of biotechnology during the year of 2001-2020 by using the Web of Science database. The analysis of most cited papers in the chosen areas of research domain will enable the researcher to identify a wide set of inferences... The aim of this paper was to identify and analyse the most highly cited research articles, and authorships levels in the discipline of biotechnology during the year of 2001-2020 by using the Web of Science database. The analysis of most cited papers in the chosen areas of research domain will enable the researcher to identify a wide set of inferences about the research area - its productivity over Annual production, page length, Most prolific authors, Most cited Countries, Most relevant affiliations of the articles etc.The results shows that a total of 3000 research articles were published during 2001- 2020 in the field of biotechnology. The most highly cited research articles were 1434, followed by 1337 review papers. 12983 papers used the term ‘biotechnology’ as keywords. The average publication of highly cited paper were 150 papers per year. Furthermore, out of 12347 research articles, 340 research articles were published in single authorship, while 12007 were published in collaborative authorship. Apparently, the highest numbers (n= 230, 7.6%) of papers were published in 2007. In terms of research output, the most productive research institutes in the field of biotechnology were ‘University of Calif Berkely’, while the most productive countries were USA and Germany. Pruitt KD and Ostell J. were the most prominent and influential authors in the field of biotechnology. Read More Read Less